Did reverse-auction procurement ever succeed at scale?

FreeMarkets achieved a modest success and was acquired by Ariba in 2004. Coupa and Jaggaer built larger procurement SaaS businesses later by focusing on spend analytics and workflow rather than pure price competition. The reverse-auction model is now a small feature inside procurement platforms rather than a standalone business.

Why did the B2B exchange model fail so broadly in 2000-2001?

The category shared three structural problems: buyers were reluctant to disrupt supplier relationships, suppliers feared margin erosion, and no single exchange reached the liquidity threshold where network effects created genuine value. Over $5 billion in B2B exchange venture capital was largely destroyed in this period.

← All autopsies

// HALL OF FLAME · STARTUP AUTOPSY

Founded	1999
Closed	2001
Country	USA
Sector	Marketplace
Total raised	40
Collapse type	Sudden Collapse
Founder	Rob Rebhan

iMandi.com

"Reverse auctions were supposed to flip procurement — buyers never showed up"

$40M

RAISED

—

EMPLOYEES

MONTHS

marketfitSudden Collapse

Unexpected shutdown within weeks of a trigger

// Fatal mistake: Procurement behaviour driven by supplier relationships and risk aversion, not pure cost optimisation

Key Events Timeline

1999-01

FOUNDING

iMandi.com founded as a B2B reverse auction platform for corporate procurement.

1999-06

FUNDING

Series A funding raised to build reverse auction marketplace infrastructure and supplier network.

2000-03

PRODUCT LAUNCH

iMandi.com launches live reverse auction platform targeting procurement departments with promised 15-30% cost savings.

2000-09

DOWN ROUND

Company raises down round after low buyer adoption; procurement managers resist disrupting existing supplier relationships through web portal.

2001-02

PIVOT

iMandi.com attempts strategic pivot to focus on supplier margin protection and long-term contracts, but volume remains critically below network effect threshold.

2001-06

SHUTDOWN

iMandi.com ceases operations after burning through $40 million in funding without achieving sustainable adoption.

🔥 Hall of Flame 15%🏆 Hall of Fame 12%

iMandi.

// full analysis

Full analysis requires the Analyst plan

Documented cause · Market cycle · Competitive moat type · Verified lesson

See Analyst plan →See all plans

€149/mo · or contribute your autopsy for free access →

More Marketplace →More from USA →More marketfit failures →Raised: 40

// YOUR STARTUP DOESN'T HAVE TO END LIKE THIS

UnicornBurn Season 0 opens July 2026. 10,000 founders competing in one world. Your startup fights for the market every Saturday. Most will end up here. Which one are you?

JOIN SEASON 0 →

// THE MARKETPLACE GRAVEYARD DOESN'T END HERE

iMandi.com followed a documented pattern. Identify the same signals in any company before they reach the point of no return.

ANALYSE A COMPANY →MORE MARKETPLACE AUTOPSIES →