// STARTUP COMPARISON
YoTaxi vs Silicon Valley Bank
YoTaxi failed in 2016 due to Competition. Silicon Valley Bank failed in 2023 due to Unit Economics. Different causes, different sectors, different eras — but the same simulation outcome.
| METRIC | 🔥 YoTaxi | 🔥 Silicon Valley Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Mobility | Fintech |
| Country | Mexico | USA |
| Founded | 2013 | 1983 |
| Died | 2016 | 2023 |
| Raised | $8M | Public company (SIVB) |
| Peak | 200K trips/month | $209B assets |
| Primary Cause | Competition | Unit Economics |
// WHY EACH FAILED
🔥 YoTaxi
Competition
YoTaxi was Mexico's first ride-hailing app, launching two years before Uber and Cabify entered the Mexican market. By 2015 the platform had 200K monthly trips and strong driver supply in Mexico City. Uber launched in Mexico in 2013 and began aggressive driver and rider subsidies, spending $1B across Latin America. YoTaxi, unable to match subsidy-funded driver guarantees or rider discounts, saw supply and demand migrate to Uber. The platform shut down in 2016.
// LESSON
Being first in ride-hailing is worthless if you can't match a late entrant's subsidy budget. YoTaxi had two years of head start and lost everything in 12 months because Uber could pay drivers more per trip than YoTaxi earned per trip.
Being first in ride-hailing is worthless if you can't match a late entrant's subsidy budget. YoTaxi had two years of head start and lost everything in 12 months because Uber could pay drivers more per trip than YoTaxi earned per trip.
🔥 Silicon Valley Bank
Unit Economics
Silicon Valley Bank collapsed in March 2023 after a bank run driven by duration mismatch. SVB had invested deposits in long-duration bonds during low-rate periods. When rates rose, those bonds lost value. SVB announced a $1.8B loss on bond sales and a capital raise — triggering a $42B bank run in 24 hours. The FDIC seized SVB on March 10, 2023 — the second-largest bank failure in US history.
// LESSON
Asset-liability duration matching is not optional for banks. Investing short-term deposits in long-term bonds is a structural bet against rising rates. SVB had $80B in long-duration bonds when the Fed began the fastest rate rise cycle in 40 years.
Asset-liability duration matching is not optional for banks. Investing short-term deposits in long-term bonds is a structural bet against rising rates. SVB had $80B in long-duration bonds when the Fed began the fastest rate rise cycle in 40 years.
// EXPLORE FURTHER