// STARTUP COMPARISON
Spin by Oxxo vs Silicon Valley Bank
Spin by Oxxo failed in 2023 due to Product Failure. Silicon Valley Bank failed in 2023 due to Unit Economics. Different causes, different sectors, different eras — but the same simulation outcome.
| METRIC | 🔥 Spin by Oxxo | 🔥 Silicon Valley Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Fintech | Fintech |
| Country | Mexico | USA |
| Founded | 2019 | 1983 |
| Died | 2023 | 2023 |
| Raised | Internal (FEMSA) | Public company (SIVB) |
| Peak | 3M users | $209B assets |
| Primary Cause | Product Failure | Unit Economics |
// WHY EACH FAILED
User registration is not user activation. A wallet with 3M registered users but 15% monthly activation is not a payments product — it is a loyalty card with extra steps.
Asset-liability duration matching is not optional for banks. Investing short-term deposits in long-term bonds is a structural bet against rising rates. SVB had $80B in long-duration bonds when the Fed began the fastest rate rise cycle in 40 years.
// IN THE SIMULATION
Spin triggers LOW_TRANSACTION_FREQUENCY — a failure mode where user acquisition succeeds but activation fails. The simulation tracks DAU/registered ratio and flags wallets where less than 20% of registered users transact monthly.
SVB triggers DURATION_MISMATCH_BANK_RUN — the simulation models banks with long-duration bond portfolios as having existential rate sensitivity. A 400bps rate rise on a long-duration portfolio creates mark-to-market losses that exceed capital when forced to sell.
// EXPLORE FURTHER