← All autopsies

// STARTUP COMPARISON

Naranja X (2022 crisis) vs Silicon Valley Bank

Naranja X (2022 crisis) failed in 2022 due to Regulation. Silicon Valley Bank failed in 2023 due to Unit Economics. Different causes, different sectors, different eras — but the same simulation outcome.

METRIC🔥 Naranja X (2022 crisis)🔥 Silicon Valley Bank
SectorFintechFintech
CountryArgentinaUSA
Founded20191983
Died20222023
Raised$100MPublic company (SIVB)
Peak3M users$209B assets
Primary CauseRegulationUnit Economics

// WHY EACH FAILED

🔥 Naranja X (2022 crisis)
Regulation
Naranja X, spun off from Banco Naranja with 3M users and $100M raised, built digital financial products for the mass market in Argentina. Hyperinflation exceeding 100% annually by late 2022 made consumer credit unmanageable — real interest rates were permanently negative, the peso depreciated constantly, and regulatory caps on card rates meant the company was structurally losing money on every credit product. Naranja X undertook significant layoffs and restructuring in 2022.
// LESSON
Consumer credit in hyperinflationary economies is a macro-level risk, not a product-level problem. No fintech product design survives 100% annual inflation if credit rates are regulated below inflation.
🔥 Silicon Valley Bank
Unit Economics
Silicon Valley Bank collapsed in March 2023 after a bank run driven by duration mismatch. SVB had invested deposits in long-duration bonds during low-rate periods. When rates rose, those bonds lost value. SVB announced a $1.8B loss on bond sales and a capital raise — triggering a $42B bank run in 24 hours. The FDIC seized SVB on March 10, 2023 — the second-largest bank failure in US history.
// LESSON
Asset-liability duration matching is not optional for banks. Investing short-term deposits in long-term bonds is a structural bet against rising rates. SVB had $80B in long-duration bonds when the Fed began the fastest rate rise cycle in 40 years.

// IN THE SIMULATION

Naranja X triggers REAL_RATE_INVERSION — when nominal rates are capped by regulation but inflation exceeds those caps, every peso lent is worth less when repaid. The simulation flags this as a structural insolvency event in high-inflation markets.

SVB triggers DURATION_MISMATCH_BANK_RUN — the simulation models banks with long-duration bond portfolios as having existential rate sensitivity. A 400bps rate rise on a long-duration portfolio creates mark-to-market losses that exceed capital when forced to sell.

// EXPLORE FURTHER

Full Naranja X (2022 crisis) autopsy →Full Silicon Valley Bank autopsy →More Regulation failures →All Fintech autopsies →