All autopsies

// STARTUP COMPARISON

Glovo (regulatory crisis) vs Habitissimo

Glovo (regulatory crisis) failed in 2023 due to Regulation. Habitissimo failed in 2020 due to Acquisition Gone Wrong. Different causes, different sectors, different eras — but the same simulation outcome.

METRIC🔥 Glovo (regulatory crisis)🔥 Habitissimo
SectorMarketplaceMarketplace
CountrySpainSpain
Founded20152009
Died20232020
Raised€1.1B€10M
Peak€2.3B valuation€15M revenue
Primary CauseRegulationAcquisition Gone Wrong

// WHY EACH FAILED

🔥 Glovo (regulatory crisis)
Regulation
Glovo, founded in Barcelona in 2015, built its business model on gig-economy couriers classified as independent contractors. Spain's Ley Rider (Riders' Law) came into force in August 2021, requiring platforms to employ delivery couriers. Glovo initially refused, accumulating €79M in fines. By 2022 it had laid off 250 tech employees. Delivery Hero, which had acquired Glovo for €2.3B in 2021, took a significant write-down.
// LESSON
Building on regulatory arbitrage — classifying employees as contractors to reduce costs — is borrowing time, not creating value. Every labor-platform regulator in the world is watching Uber, Deliveroo, and Glovo. The clock runs in every jurisdiction simultaneously.
🔥 Habitissimo
Acquisition Gone Wrong
Habitissimo was Spain and Latin America's leading home services marketplace, connecting homeowners with contractors. It was acquired by ANGI Homeservices (HomeAdvisor) in 2017. Post-acquisition, local product focus deteriorated, engineering teams were dispersed across ANGI's global structure, and Habitissimo's market position eroded as local competitors rebuilt trust with Spanish users.
// LESSON
Marketplace network effects are hyper-local. Trust cannot be managed remotely. Acquiring a marketplace and running it from another continent destroys the very thing that made it valuable.

// EXPLORE FURTHER