All autopsies

// STARTUP COMPARISON

Frubana vs Habitissimo

Frubana failed in 2023 due to Unit Economics. Habitissimo failed in 2020 due to Acquisition Gone Wrong. Different causes, different sectors, different eras — but the same simulation outcome.

METRIC🔥 Frubana🔥 Habitissimo
SectorMarketplaceMarketplace
CountryColombiaSpain
Founded20182009
Died20232020
Raised$186M€10M
Peak$186M raised€15M revenue
Primary CauseUnit EconomicsAcquisition Gone Wrong

// WHY EACH FAILED

🔥 Frubana
Unit Economics
Frubana built a B2B marketplace connecting restaurants with fresh produce suppliers across Colombia, Brazil, and Mexico. After raising $186M, the company struggled with the perishability economics of fresh produce — spoilage rates, last-mile cold chain costs, and the fragmented supplier base made unit economics unsolvable at the ticket sizes restaurants order. Frubana shut down in 2023.
// LESSON
Fresh produce supply chains have physics problems that capital cannot solve. Spoilage is a function of time and density. If you can't achieve minimum order density per zone before your runway runs out, the unit economics never improve.
🔥 Habitissimo
Acquisition Gone Wrong
Habitissimo was Spain and Latin America's leading home services marketplace, connecting homeowners with contractors. It was acquired by ANGI Homeservices (HomeAdvisor) in 2017. Post-acquisition, local product focus deteriorated, engineering teams were dispersed across ANGI's global structure, and Habitissimo's market position eroded as local competitors rebuilt trust with Spanish users.
// LESSON
Marketplace network effects are hyper-local. Trust cannot be managed remotely. Acquiring a marketplace and running it from another continent destroys the very thing that made it valuable.

// EXPLORE FURTHER