All autopsies

// STARTUP COMPARISON

Singu vs Glovo (regulatory crisis)

Singu failed in 2020 due to Bad Timing. Glovo (regulatory crisis) failed in 2023 due to Regulation. Different causes, different sectors, different eras — but the same simulation outcome.

METRIC🔥 Singu🔥 Glovo (regulatory crisis)
SectorMarketplaceMarketplace
CountryBrazilSpain
Founded20152015
Died20202023
Raised$25M€1.1B
Peak$25M raised€2.3B valuation
Primary CauseBad TimingRegulation

// WHY EACH FAILED

🔥 Singu
Bad Timing
Singu built an on-demand beauty and wellness services marketplace in Brazil, connecting clients with freelance beauticians for home visits. After raising $25M, COVID-19 made in-home beauty services impossible — both legally restricted and demand-collapsed. With no revenue and no alternative use case for the platform, Singu shut down in 2020.
// LESSON
On-demand physical service marketplaces have zero pandemic resilience. There is no digital pivot for a haircut. Build 12 months of cash reserves and a digital service layer (virtual consultations, product sales) before an event that bans physical services.
🔥 Glovo (regulatory crisis)
Regulation
Glovo, founded in Barcelona in 2015, built its business model on gig-economy couriers classified as independent contractors. Spain's Ley Rider (Riders' Law) came into force in August 2021, requiring platforms to employ delivery couriers. Glovo initially refused, accumulating €79M in fines. By 2022 it had laid off 250 tech employees. Delivery Hero, which had acquired Glovo for €2.3B in 2021, took a significant write-down.
// LESSON
Building on regulatory arbitrage — classifying employees as contractors to reduce costs — is borrowing time, not creating value. Every labor-platform regulator in the world is watching Uber, Deliveroo, and Glovo. The clock runs in every jurisdiction simultaneously.

// EXPLORE FURTHER