// STARTUP COMPARISON
QuintoAndar (2022 crisis) vs Spotahome
QuintoAndar (2022 crisis) failed in 2022 due to Unit Economics. Spotahome failed in 2020 due to Bad Timing. Different causes, different sectors, different eras — but the same simulation outcome.
| METRIC | 🔥 QuintoAndar (2022 crisis) | 🔥 Spotahome |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Proptech | Proptech |
| Country | Brazil | Spain |
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
| Died | 2022 | 2020 |
| Raised | $780M | $80M |
| Peak | $5.1B valuation | $80M raised |
| Primary Cause | Unit Economics | Bad Timing |
// WHY EACH FAILED
Real estate marketplaces are macro-correlated even when they don't hold inventory. Rate rises slow transaction velocity, reduce listings, and compress take rates simultaneously. The valuation that justified your headcount was built on a specific rate environment.
When all your customer segments depend on the same macro condition (free cross-border mobility), your diversified customer base is actually a concentrated risk. Spotahome had students, expats, and nomads — and lost all three at once.
// IN THE SIMULATION
QuintoAndar triggers RENTAL_MARKET_RATE_SENSITIVITY — the simulation models rental marketplaces as indirectly rate-sensitive: rising mortgage rates reduce rental supply (owners hold rather than rent) and reduce transaction velocity as the overall property market slows.
Spotahome triggers MOBILITY_DEPENDENCY_COLLAPSE — the simulation models mid-term rental platforms as having three correlated demand inputs (students, expats, nomads) that all go to zero under the same macro shock.
// EXPLORE FURTHER