All autopsies

// STARTUP COMPARISON

Olist (2022 restructuring) vs Glovo (regulatory crisis)

Olist (2022 restructuring) failed in 2022 due to Unit Economics. Glovo (regulatory crisis) failed in 2023 due to Regulation. Different causes, different sectors, different eras — but the same simulation outcome.

METRIC🔥 Olist (2022 restructuring)🔥 Glovo (regulatory crisis)
SectorMarketplaceMarketplace
CountryBrazilSpain
Founded20152015
Died20222023
Raised$200M€1.1B
Peak$1.4B valuation€2.3B valuation
Primary CauseUnit EconomicsRegulation

// WHY EACH FAILED

🔥 Olist (2022 restructuring)
Unit Economics
Olist, a Brazilian marketplace platform enabling SMEs to sell on major e-commerce platforms, raised $200M and reached $1.4B valuation. Post-COVID e-commerce normalization in 2022 reduced GMV growth below plan. Combined with its 2021 acquisition of Pax (logistics) and Vnda (e-commerce SaaS), the expanded cost base exceeded revenue growth. Olist laid off 350 employees in 2022 and restructured its multi-product strategy.
// LESSON
Acquisitions made at the top of a COVID-era growth cycle create cost bases sized for peak-scenario revenue. When growth normalizes, the acquired assets become overhead. Size acquisitions for trend growth, not peak-cycle growth.
🔥 Glovo (regulatory crisis)
Regulation
Glovo, founded in Barcelona in 2015, built its business model on gig-economy couriers classified as independent contractors. Spain's Ley Rider (Riders' Law) came into force in August 2021, requiring platforms to employ delivery couriers. Glovo initially refused, accumulating €79M in fines. By 2022 it had laid off 250 tech employees. Delivery Hero, which had acquired Glovo for €2.3B in 2021, took a significant write-down.
// LESSON
Building on regulatory arbitrage — classifying employees as contractors to reduce costs — is borrowing time, not creating value. Every labor-platform regulator in the world is watching Uber, Deliveroo, and Glovo. The clock runs in every jurisdiction simultaneously.

// EXPLORE FURTHER