// STARTUP COMPARISON
Increase (Argentina) vs LendingClub (2016 crisis)
Increase (Argentina) failed in 2022 due to Founder Chaos. LendingClub (2016 crisis) failed in 2016 due to Founder Chaos. Both failed for the same reason — Founder Chaos.
| METRIC | 🔥 Increase (Argentina) | 🔥 LendingClub (2016 crisis) |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Fintech | Fintech |
| Country | Argentina | USA |
| Founded | 2015 | 2006 |
| Died | 2022 | 2016 |
| Raised | $20M | $1.3B |
| Peak | $20M raised | $9B valuation |
| Primary Cause | Founder Chaos | Founder Chaos |
// WHY EACH FAILED
Co-founder agreements must specify conflict resolution mechanisms before the conflict exists. By the time a co-founder dispute is irreconcilable, the damage to the team and product is already done.
For marketplace lenders, loan data integrity is the product. Falsifying origination dates is not a compliance technicality — it invalidates every institutional investor's credit risk model and destroys the trust that marketplace lending is built on.
// IN THE SIMULATION
Increase triggers COFOUNDERS_DISPUTE — the simulation models co-founder exits as the second most common cause of Series A-stage company failure after unit economics. When technical co-founders leave, product velocity drops 60%+ and team morale collapses.
LendingClub triggers FINTECH_FOUNDER_DATA_MANIPULATION — the simulation models loan data integrity as a hard constraint for marketplace lenders. When origination data is falsified, every institutional investor's credit model becomes invalid simultaneously.
// EXPLORE FURTHER