All autopsies

// STARTUP COMPARISON

GetSwift vs Scytl

GetSwift failed in 2019 due to Fraud. Scytl failed in 2020 due to Ran Out of Money. Different causes, different sectors, different eras — but the same simulation outcome.

METRIC🔥 GetSwift🔥 Scytl
SectorSaaSSaaS
CountryAustraliaSpain
Founded20152001
Died20192020
RaisedPublic (ASX)$100M
PeakA$1.2B market capElections in 42+ countries
Primary CauseFraudRan Out of Money

// WHY EACH FAILED

🔥 GetSwift
Fraud
GetSwift, a delivery management SaaS, listed on the ASX in 2016 and reached A$1.2B market cap. The company announced contracts with companies including Amazon, CommBank, and Yum! Brands that were either misrepresented or never finalized. ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) launched an investigation. Founders were charged with market manipulation and misleading disclosure. The company was delisted and shareholders lost hundreds of millions.
// LESSON
For ASX-listed companies, continuous disclosure obligations make premature contract announcements a criminal matter. "Partnership discussions" and "signed contracts" are legally distinct categories. Misrepresenting one as the other is market manipulation.
🔥 Scytl
Ran Out of Money
Scytl was the world's leading provider of election technology, having processed votes in over 42 countries. It raised $100M from Vulcan Capital and others. In 2020 COVID-19 caused the cancellation or postponement of hundreds of elections globally — Scytl's entire revenue base. Unable to survive the collapse, Scytl filed for insolvency in June 2020 and was acquired by Paragon Group.
// LESSON
Market leadership in an event-driven market is concentrated risk, not a moat. When the event cycle pauses globally, your entire revenue base pauses with it. Diversify revenue streams before a black swan can.

// EXPLORE FURTHER