All autopsies

// STARTUP COMPARISON

Frubana vs Trovit

Frubana failed in 2023 due to Unit Economics. Trovit failed in 2014 due to Acquisition Gone Wrong. Different causes, different sectors, different eras — but the same simulation outcome.

METRIC🔥 Frubana🔥 Trovit
SectorMarketplaceMarketplace
CountryColombiaSpain
Founded20182006
Died20232014
Raised$186MBootstrapped then acquired
Peak$186M raised€50M revenue
Primary CauseUnit EconomicsAcquisition Gone Wrong

// WHY EACH FAILED

🔥 Frubana
Unit Economics
Frubana built a B2B marketplace connecting restaurants with fresh produce suppliers across Colombia, Brazil, and Mexico. After raising $186M, the company struggled with the perishability economics of fresh produce — spoilage rates, last-mile cold chain costs, and the fragmented supplier base made unit economics unsolvable at the ticket sizes restaurants order. Frubana shut down in 2023.
// LESSON
Fresh produce supply chains have physics problems that capital cannot solve. Spoilage is a function of time and density. If you can't achieve minimum order density per zone before your runway runs out, the unit economics never improve.
🔥 Trovit
Acquisition Gone Wrong
Trovit was a classifieds search aggregator founded in Barcelona with strong positions in Spanish, Italian, and Brazilian markets. It was acquired by Japan's Next Co. in 2014 for approximately €80M. Under Japanese corporate ownership, product focus deteriorated, key engineers left, and the platform was gradually wound down and replaced by Next's own products.
// LESSON
Acquisition price does not guarantee product continuity. A culturally misaligned buyer destroys more value than they paid — especially when the value was a product culture that cannot be transplanted.

// EXPLORE FURTHER