All autopsies

// STARTUP COMPARISON

Frubana vs Glovo (regulatory crisis)

Frubana failed in 2023 due to Unit Economics. Glovo (regulatory crisis) failed in 2023 due to Regulation. Different causes, different sectors, different eras — but the same simulation outcome.

METRIC🔥 Frubana🔥 Glovo (regulatory crisis)
SectorMarketplaceMarketplace
CountryColombiaSpain
Founded20182015
Died20232023
Raised$186M€1.1B
Peak$186M raised€2.3B valuation
Primary CauseUnit EconomicsRegulation

// WHY EACH FAILED

🔥 Frubana
Unit Economics
Frubana built a B2B marketplace connecting restaurants with fresh produce suppliers across Colombia, Brazil, and Mexico. After raising $186M, the company struggled with the perishability economics of fresh produce — spoilage rates, last-mile cold chain costs, and the fragmented supplier base made unit economics unsolvable at the ticket sizes restaurants order. Frubana shut down in 2023.
// LESSON
Fresh produce supply chains have physics problems that capital cannot solve. Spoilage is a function of time and density. If you can't achieve minimum order density per zone before your runway runs out, the unit economics never improve.
🔥 Glovo (regulatory crisis)
Regulation
Glovo, founded in Barcelona in 2015, built its business model on gig-economy couriers classified as independent contractors. Spain's Ley Rider (Riders' Law) came into force in August 2021, requiring platforms to employ delivery couriers. Glovo initially refused, accumulating €79M in fines. By 2022 it had laid off 250 tech employees. Delivery Hero, which had acquired Glovo for €2.3B in 2021, took a significant write-down.
// LESSON
Building on regulatory arbitrage — classifying employees as contractors to reduce costs — is borrowing time, not creating value. Every labor-platform regulator in the world is watching Uber, Deliveroo, and Glovo. The clock runs in every jurisdiction simultaneously.

// EXPLORE FURTHER